Grace and peace in the Lord,
Well, we've made it half way through Hebrews and it has been every bit as challenging and enriching as promised. Hebrews 7 is the longest chapter in the letter so far. It contains more detailed exposition of the differences between the priesthood established by the Law following the line of Aaron and the priesthood established by God's promise following the line of Melchizedek.
The outline theme (remember, I changed the acronym from 'SON IS SUPERIOR' to 'SON IS MEDIATOR') is based on the 'E' of Mediator:
- Example of Melchizedek (1-10)
- Excellence of Jesus (11-28)
The Memory passages from each section are
- Example of Melchizedek
Hebrews 7:1
1For this Melchizedek, king of Salem, priest of the Most High God, met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings and blessed him,
- Excellence of Jesus
Hebrews 7:22,25
22This makes Jesus the guarantor of a better covenant.
25Consequently, he is able to save to the uttermost those who draw near to God through him, since he always lives to make intercession for them.
In discussing the
Example of Melchizedek in verses 1-10, the writer tackles two main issues; who is Melchizedek (1-3) and why is he important (4-10). But even though the writer spends a few verses describing Melchizedek, his identity has still been much debated. We know that his name means 'king of righteousness, that he was a king of Salem (or Jerusalem; means 'king of peace') and that he was a priest appointed by God. We know that he went out to meet Abraham in order to bless him, and Abraham tithed the bounty they received to Melchizedek.
But verse 3 casts some mystery over his nature. What did the writer intend by describing Melchizedek as 'without father or mother or genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but resembling the Son of God he continues a priest forever'? On first read one might be tempted to think that Melchizedek was something besides a human being; perhaps an angel or even Christ in a preincarnate state.
Many intelligent, godly people have scrutinized this passage and have come to varying conclusions. Here is my humble attempt (grated, highly informed by all of those intelligent, godly people). Since the writer has already established that Jesus is a fully qualified high priest after the order of Melchizedek (5:6, 10, 6:20), we can naturally view Melchizedek and his king/priesthood as a 'type', or example of the ultimate king/priesthood of Christ. Because we don't have a record of Melchizedek's birth, death or end of reign, he in many ways does resemble Christ who is eternal (though he became incarnate) and who reigns forever. Also keep in mind that the writer is contrasting the priesthood of Melchizedek against the priesthood of Aaron (of the Levitical line)....which is a perfect segue to the second part of section 1.
Verse 4 titles the 'why is Melchizedek important' theme perfectly; 'see how great this man was'. The writer then proves this by showing that he was even greater than Abraham in that 1) it was Abraham who gave a tithe to Melchizedek (an action of a lesser to a greater) and 2) that Melchizedek blessed Abraham (an action of a greater to a lesser). 3) Tithes under the Mosaic Law were received by mortal men, but this tithe was received by 'on who...lives'; whose priesthood has no end. And 4) even Levi, the father of the priestly line under the law 'gave tithes' to Melchizedek because Levi was still 'in the loins' of Abraham at this time (Abraham being Levi's great-grandfather).
To summarize vv1-10, Melchizedek's priesthood is an example of Christ's and is superior to Aaron's.
The second thematic section begins in verse 11 and is titles
Excellence of Christ. After proving that Melchizedek's priesthood is superior to Aaron's, the writer now illustrates that Christ's priesthood is greatest of all.
The writer reminds us that perfection was not attainable through the Law that was attended to by the Levite priests in the line of Aaron. If it was attainable, why was there a need for another priest from another line? Jesus was descended from Judah, not Levi, and became high priest not by 'bodily descent' but by the direct appointing of God by 'the power of an indestructible life'. The writer quotes again Ps 110:4 with a specific emphasis; 'You are a priest
forever after the order of Melchizedek' (17).
(by the way, I'm getting really good at typing Melchizedek, but I had to add it to my dictionary because I was tired of seeing the squiggly red line under it)
Then the writer pulls the old 'I've got some bad news and some good news' line in vv18-19. 'The bad news is that the Law is useless and weak and can make nothing perfect. But the good news is that we now have a better hope in which we can actually draw near to God!'
Some more good news is that this hope is based on an oath from God (who fulfills His promises); Christ is a Priest forever and the Guarantor of this better covenant. The priests of the Law could not continue their duties forever because they died, but Christ's priesthood is permanent because He lives forever. Verse 25 then speaks for itself:
25Consequently, he is able to save to the uttermost those who draw near to God through him, since he always lives to make intercession for them.
Then verses 26-28 review the qualifications of Christ's priesthood. He is holy, innocent, unstained by sin, separate from sinners, exalted above the heavens, and does not need to offer sacrifices for His own sin (because He had none). He, Christ the Lamb of God, offered Himself as the once for all sacrifice for the atonement of the sins of all who believe in Him, and by the promise of God He will remain our High Priest forever.
How does this impact my worship?
How is it that I can forget the privilege I have to draw near to God? I can draw near to God. He wants me to. I can. And it is all because Christ has 'saved me to the uttermost'. But how do I balance familiarity and closeness against flippancy and irreverence? If I walk humbly with God (Micah 6:8, 1 Pet 5:6) with the attitude of a beloved son....I think that honors him. It's amazing that I even have to remind myself to walk humbly with Him. But it just goes to show the state of my 'human-ness'; if unchecked, there is no limit to my pride and arrogance.
How does this impact my discipleship?
This chapter was a tremendous lesson in logical progression. The writer lays out the objective and then hammers away with argument after argument. I really enjoy reading the flow of thought in Hebrews. It reminds me that thoroughness and summary are helpful tools when dealing with difficult issues.
Lord, Jesus, my High Priest, Advocate, and Intercessor, please help me discern my own heart's approach to You. Please don't let me stray so far to reverence that I forget you are my brother and friend, but also not so far to familiarity that I forget you are God. Thank You for leading me. I choose today to deny myself, take up my cross, and follow You.
epj